296
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 212:
Line 212: + + + +
no edit summary
:::Dude, there already is a truly conservative edition of the Bible: The King James! See my recent additions to [[Liberal Christianity]]. Although truly conservative Christians are rare, even rarer than anyone else on the net, this site is the one of the closest I've found. That's why it bugged me when Aschlafly said the NIV was a conservative Bible. N means "new!" NIV, and all the other "new" versions, are based on a completely different Greek translation of the Bible than KJV. That's why the doctrine they get from it is so different. --[[User:StevenM|Steve]] 14:13, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
:::Dude, there already is a truly conservative edition of the Bible: The King James! See my recent additions to [[Liberal Christianity]]. Although truly conservative Christians are rare, even rarer than anyone else on the net, this site is the one of the closest I've found. That's why it bugged me when Aschlafly said the NIV was a conservative Bible. N means "new!" NIV, and all the other "new" versions, are based on a completely different Greek translation of the Bible than KJV. That's why the doctrine they get from it is so different. --[[User:StevenM|Steve]] 14:13, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
== Question ==
"Nearly all modern scholars agree that this Pericope de Adultera is not authentic"....shouldn't it read "modern ''biblical'' scholars"? [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 17:08, 16 May 2008 (EDT)