Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Reversion explained: He cut and run, can we now delete please?
Line 394: Line 394:     
In short Mr.Schlafly, you have nothing, nothing at all except a hollow vessel, a wisp in the wind, a ship without water to sail upon.  But you do still have your interesting theory.  If you had properly defined your hypothesis, determined the population, and conducted the tests correctly, I can believe that you may well have a case.  But the problem is that this 'article' actually hurts your case terribly as it is so utterly lacking in credibility - and it also destroys any credibility you might have had as an analyst in future because you have chosen to fall upon the argument that is no argument at all - "It is so because I say it is so".  Finally, when all you needed to prove your case was a simple, cold analysis of the facts, you instead choose to say "You have free will to reject logic".  I - we - all of us who have stood in front of this vestigal edifice of thread and dust, rest our cases.  Please delete this mystery without mystery.  Good day to you.  [[User:StatsFan|StatsFan]] 10:49, 10 May 2008 (EDT)
 
In short Mr.Schlafly, you have nothing, nothing at all except a hollow vessel, a wisp in the wind, a ship without water to sail upon.  But you do still have your interesting theory.  If you had properly defined your hypothesis, determined the population, and conducted the tests correctly, I can believe that you may well have a case.  But the problem is that this 'article' actually hurts your case terribly as it is so utterly lacking in credibility - and it also destroys any credibility you might have had as an analyst in future because you have chosen to fall upon the argument that is no argument at all - "It is so because I say it is so".  Finally, when all you needed to prove your case was a simple, cold analysis of the facts, you instead choose to say "You have free will to reject logic".  I - we - all of us who have stood in front of this vestigal edifice of thread and dust, rest our cases.  Please delete this mystery without mystery.  Good day to you.  [[User:StatsFan|StatsFan]] 10:49, 10 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
==Deletion==
 +
Since Schlafly has cut and run rather than try to back up his little pet thesis here, can we get this deleted now?--[[User:ChandaM|ChandaM]] 18:03, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
2

edits

Navigation menu