Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 75: Line 75:     
If Mrs. Schlafly is not associated with Conservapedia then why did the April 25th CP News headline refer to her as "Conservapedian Phyllis Schlafly"? --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 11:10, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
 
If Mrs. Schlafly is not associated with Conservapedia then why did the April 25th CP News headline refer to her as "Conservapedian Phyllis Schlafly"? --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 11:10, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Clever try, but Ferno gave his "reason" and that was not it.  "Conservapedian" is an honorary title, as in the context of giving someone an award.  My problem is not with disqualifying this nominee, but with Ferno's style of reasoning and his repeatedly unjustified insinuations, as in his signature above.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:45, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,208

edits

Navigation menu