1,645
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 81:
Line 81: + +
Talk:Essay:Conservapedia Awards (view source)
Revision as of 17:58, May 18, 2008
, 17:58, May 18, 2008→Phyllis Schlafly
::: Yes. But notice how you couldn't say that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:50, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
::: Yes. But notice how you couldn't say that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:50, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
::::Your argument above is that it is pointless to say that you are wrong if you actually think that you're wrong, right? Why would someone admit they were wrong if they didn't think that they were wrong? You are using pretty circular logic. But to wrap this up, being a "Conservapedian" doesn't associate you with Conservapedia, and even questioning that makes you a conspiracist. And BTW I never "gave" a reason why Phyllis Schlafly should not be included, I just asked a question. '''[[user:FernoKlump|<font color="#000066" >FernoKlump</font>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:FernoKlump|<font color="#bd2433" >Whenever I put something here I get in trouble]]</font></sup> 13:58, 18 May 2008 (EDT)