1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: + + + + + + + +
Quick move to the bottom to follow chronological order, plus reply
Potential expansions of the Damadian case should most likely be done in his article, but that's just my current opinion. Thanks to Bturpin for the additional source there, by the way. :) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 11:24, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
Potential expansions of the Damadian case should most likely be done in his article, but that's just my current opinion. Thanks to Bturpin for the additional source there, by the way. :) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 11:24, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
==Very nice work==
Bravo [[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]]!! Very nice work. Cleaned it up real good like. Nice and neutral w/o the pejorative aspects of its former self. (I'm not a big fan of the "chip on the shoulder" tone that many articles here seem to have.)
Again nice work. We'll have to get a list of winners and maybe flesh it out with a box or something. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 11:42, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
:Thank you kindly! :) A list of the winners would be... long. Seven categories, more than a hundred years, yearly prizes... What might work would be an extra page per section, with this main article only listing the most recent winners and linking to the extra pages for more info. A template/box with info or links sounds like a nice idea, though!
:There is still quite a bit of history and stuff that could be added, but it'll take some long-term community work (long history pages like the Nobel Foundation one are dry reading for me =P). --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 11:54, 18 March 2007 (EDT)