1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: + Line 4:
Line 5: − + − + −
Adding some more headlines to early discussions
==Discovery of what?
YO! [[User:Sid_3050]], the sentence, ''"In two cases, the Nobel Prize was denied to the person most responsible for the discovery apparently..."'' meaning the discovery of ''what'', exactly? [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 17:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
YO! [[User:Sid_3050]], the sentence, ''"In two cases, the Nobel Prize was denied to the person most responsible for the discovery apparently..."'' meaning the discovery of ''what'', exactly? [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 17:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
:...why are you asking ME? I didn't add that sentence. Check the edit history. However, the two cases are shown in the following paragraphs. For what it's worth: The article doesn't state what discovery Hoyle should have received a Nobel Prize for, ''as I pointed out in my edit summary''. General advice: Chill out, yo. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:59, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
:...why are you asking ME? I didn't add that sentence. Check the edit history. However, the two cases are shown in the following paragraphs. For what it's worth: The article doesn't state what discovery Hoyle should have received a Nobel Prize for, ''as I pointed out in my edit summary''. General advice: Chill out, yo. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:59, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Awesome! :) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:07, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Awesome! :) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:07, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
==Damadian's exclusion - possible reason==
Actually if you look around you'll find other possible reasons that Damadian at least didn't get the Nobel (I'm not familiar with Hoyle). See, for example: [http://whyfiles.org/188nobel_mri/2.html]. It would be more accurate to say that some think it's because of his view of evolution, or something to that effect, since clearly other reasons have been put forth.--[[User:Murray|Murray]] 23:24, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Actually if you look around you'll find other possible reasons that Damadian at least didn't get the Nobel (I'm not familiar with Hoyle). See, for example: [http://whyfiles.org/188nobel_mri/2.html]. It would be more accurate to say that some think it's because of his view of evolution, or something to that effect, since clearly other reasons have been put forth.--[[User:Murray|Murray]] 23:24, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
==Reagan and the Pope==
The article says "as the prize was not given to Ronald Reagan or Pope John Paul II" but does not state *why* they should have received the prize, or even which Nobel Prize.
The article says "as the prize was not given to Ronald Reagan or Pope John Paul II" but does not state *why* they should have received the prize, or even which Nobel Prize.