Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
3,587
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − CONSERVAPEDIA IS A BIASED AND BIGOT ENCYCLOPEDIA. I, A MARTYR OF WIKIPEDIA, DECLARE WAR ON THIS PITIFUL COVEN OF RELIGIOUS ZEALOTS+ + + + + +
Undo revision 456352 by Special:Contributions/Environmentlove1REVERT VANDALISM
In '''''Carey v. Musladin''''', 127 S. Ct. 649 (2006), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] affirmed a state court ruling that buttons displaying a murder victim's image worn by the victim's family during respondent's trial did not deny respondent his right to a fair trial.
Justice [[Clarence Thomas]], writing for the court, wrote that the state court's ruling was not contrary to clearly established federal law, and was not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1).
The Court recognized that certain courtroom practices are so inherently prejudicial that they deprive the defendant of a fair trial. ''Estelle v. Williams'', 425 U.S. 501, 503-506 (1976); ''Holbrook v. Flynn'', 475 U.S. 560, 568 (1986).
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]