23
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 878:
Line 878: + + + +
Pro-"Abortion" needs changing
==introductory paragraphs==
==introductory paragraphs==
The first few paragraphs after the 1st paragraphs need a lot of work. Maybe integrate the ideas later into the article. The way it is now makes conservapedia look biased. It looks like an attack piece. One can integrate the same facts into a better written article.[[User:BTV|BTV]] 01:55, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
The first few paragraphs after the 1st paragraphs need a lot of work. Maybe integrate the ideas later into the article. The way it is now makes conservapedia look biased. It looks like an attack piece. One can integrate the same facts into a better written article.[[User:BTV|BTV]] 01:55, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
== Pro-"Abortion" needs changing ==
In the introduction, someone please change that statement that Obama is "Pro-Abortion" to its correct term, "Pro-Choice." I understand this is a conservative encyclopedia, but I don't think anyone gets their jollies off on abortion. I am pro-life, but I will at least respect the debate (as far as I can respect Party Politics) enough to not use aggressive and untrue labels, such as naming someone who is Pro-Choice as Pro-Abortion. There is a literal difference between the two, so someone please fix that. There's enough of the conservative bias in the article without these foolish techniques. --[[User:Capolavoro046|Capolavoro046]] 14:09, 19 May 2008 (EDT)