Changes

:: OK, we agree there won't be a double-blind study, or any formal study.  But my question remains unanswered:  what increase in cancer incidence would you require to admit cause for concern?  100x?  1,000,000x?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:01, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

:: OK, we agree there won't be a double-blind study, or any formal study.  But my question remains unanswered:  what increase in cancer incidence would you require to admit cause for concern?  100x?  1,000,000x?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:01, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

::Murray, don't presume ASchlafly has no evidence.  This is his site, and I'm sure he, more than anyone, is ready with verifiable evidence, just as his Commandment #1 demands.  Mr.Schlafly - I'm sure you're about to provide that evidence, and I'm sure you realize that asking rhetorical questions of your interlocutors is not the same as providing the methods being you theory?  [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 23:17, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

::Murray, don't presume ASchlafly has no evidence.  This is his site, and I'm sure he, more than anyone, is ready with verifiable evidence, just as his Commandment #1 demands.  Mr.Schlafly - I'm sure you're about to provide that evidence, and I'm sure you realize that asking rhetorical questions of your interlocutors is not the same as providing the methods behind your theory?  [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 23:17, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

==Confused==

==Confused==