163
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 115:
Line 115: − − :My friend TK's original post described me as a "frustrating and angry man". All I can say is that I think there's only one angry man around here... ;-) Line 123:
Line 121: + + + +
no edit summary
*3, It means not a wit where someone is from. Here the rules are, use American spelling and customs. Start your own UK Conservapedia, and enforce your customs there. --[[User:TK|TK]] 10:34, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
*3, It means not a wit where someone is from. Here the rules are, use American spelling and customs. Start your own UK Conservapedia, and enforce your customs there. --[[User:TK|TK]] 10:34, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
:TK, if you'd like to make your knowledge of the 1990 leadership election even more extensive and formidable, I recommend ''A Conservative Coup'' by Alan Watkins, which also has other information about Lady T. It's by a liberal journalist, but it's quite interesting. I understand that the original title was ''A Conservative Who Was Allowed to Resign by a Party that Held Her in Very High Regard''.
:TK, if you'd like to make your knowledge of the 1990 leadership election even more extensive and formidable, I recommend ''A Conservative Coup'' by Alan Watkins, which also has other information about Lady T. It's by a liberal journalist, but it's quite interesting. I understand that the original title was ''A Conservative Who Was Allowed to Resign by a Party that Held Her in Very High Regard''.
*Pity you couldn't be bothered to follow the source links. It is 10 Downings own website where it explains about her not standing for the second vote. I think users of this wiki will be more inclined to believe that source, wot? And as the book title you recommend says exactly what I have been saying, I guess there isn't a need to look at it, eh? Since she did what she did, it is technically what it is. It would be intellectually dishonest to say they forced her out, since she didn't allow that to happen. Introducing comments that I deleted, because I thought better of making them, letting them remain, only makes you a very small, petty creature. If you think it embarasses me, you are right. If you received some satisfaction from it, I shall pray for you. --[[User:TK|TK]] 11:03, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
*Pity you couldn't be bothered to follow the source links. It is 10 Downings own website where it explains about her not standing for the second vote. I think users of this wiki will be more inclined to believe that source, wot? And as the book title you recommend says exactly what I have been saying, I guess there isn't a need to look at it, eh? Since she did what she did, it is technically what it is. It would be intellectually dishonest to say they forced her out, since she didn't allow that to happen. Introducing comments that I deleted, because I thought better of making them, letting them remain, only makes you a very small, petty creature. If you think it embarasses me, you are right. If you received some satisfaction from it, I shall pray for you. --[[User:TK|TK]] 11:03, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
:You're right, I shouldn't have quoted your deleted comments. While I thought they were unfair, I've removed them now, and I apologise. As to the rest, I enjoy political history, and the events of November 1990 would be interesting to discuss further. They (and their aftermath and consequences) may at some point deserve their own section of this article, when it grows and develops. Let's leave it for the moment, though.
:Maybe a more constructive line of enquiry would be to ask what amendments to the intro you would support making? I still think it's not in a satisfactory state at the moment. One suggestion would be to split it into separate sub-paragraphs. Also, I'm now going to add a skeleton section on Lady T's pre-1979 career, which isn't covered at present. --[[User:Dumezil22|Dumezil22]] 17:16, 18 March 2007 (GMT)