17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + +
Debate: If not naturalism, how do we decide which supernatural explanation is correct? (view source)
Revision as of 17:03, May 21, 2008
, 17:03, May 21, 2008no edit summary
: Answer to both questions: See which explanation is more consistent with the evidence. The implicit assumption that this cannot be done with a supernatural explanation is false.
: Answer to both questions: See which explanation is more consistent with the evidence. The implicit assumption that this cannot be done with a supernatural explanation is false.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:50, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:50, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
Ok, let's assume that we are choosing between two supernatural explanations, having decided to go that path. Are you saying that evidence can be used to prove a supernatural explanation, and therefore, to disprove others?
: [[User:Paddyduffy|Paddyduffy]]