| Line 85: |
Line 85: |
| | Where laughter fails, whisky will prevail! | | Where laughter fails, whisky will prevail! |
| | [[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 00:28, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | | [[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 00:28, 28 April 2008 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Copying from Wikipedia == |
| | + | |
| | + | All you did was change or omit a few words. You used many of the same phrasings and almost exactly the same sentence-by-sentence layout. |
| | + | |
| | + | Your first paragraph: |
| | + | <blockquote> |
| | + | Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al., Case # 04cv2688, was a challenge brought in the United States federal court against a public school that required teachers to present intelligent design as an alternative to evolution as an explanation of the origins of life. The plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of creationism and the school's policy violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and the Lemon Test. |
| | + | </blockquote> |
| | + | |
| | + | From Wikipedia: |
| | + | <blockquote> |
| | + | Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al., Case No. 04cv2688, was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts against a public school district that required the presentation of "Intelligent Design" as an alternative to evolution as an "explanation of the origin of life." The plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of creationism, and that the school board policy thus violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. |
| | + | </blockquote> |
| | + | |
| | + | Your second paragraph: |
| | + | <blockquote> |
| | + | The plaintiffs, eleven parents of students at the Dover Area School District, sued the school board over a statement in support of Intelligent design that was to be read aloud during science classes when evolution was taught. The parents were represented by American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and Pepper Hamilton LLP. The defendants retained the services of the Thomas Moore Law Center. |
| | + | </blockquote> |
| | + | |
| | + | Wikipedia: |
| | + | <blockquote> |
| | + | Eleven parents of students in Dover, Pennsylvania, near York, sued the Dover Area School District over a statement that the school board required be read aloud in ninth-grade science classes when evolution was taught. The plaintiffs were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU) and Pepper Hamilton LLP. The National Center for Science Education (NCSE) acted as consultants for the plaintiffs. The defendants were represented by the Thomas More Law Center |
| | + | </blockquote> |
| | + | |
| | + | Perhaps it's just a coincidence. Most likely it's [un]intelligent design. |
| | + | |
| | + | As far as other edits you've made, yes, I have had a problem with some of them when they are obviously meant to undermine the purpose of Conservapedia. I replaced your quotes about atheism to fit the intended purpose of the article. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 22:07, 21 May 2008 (EDT) |