1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: +
Debate:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced? (view source)
Revision as of 18:03, May 22, 2008
, 18:03, May 22, 2008no edit summary
==No==
==No==
Read the name of the website "conservapedia" i think that sums it up, this site is a joke. I have been laughing non stop at every article. Ps. God is fake
Conservapedia is not meant to be fair and balanced; its meant to be an alternative to wikipedia. Although an alternativeis necessary, its focus on being un-wikipedian greatly weakens its ability to grow.
Conservapedia is not meant to be fair and balanced; its meant to be an alternative to wikipedia. Although an alternativeis necessary, its focus on being un-wikipedian greatly weakens its ability to grow.