Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Testability of intelligent design (view source)
Revision as of 17:08, May 23, 2008
, 17:08, May 23, 2008New page: Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA: :It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a designer is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the tes...
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA]]:
:It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a [[Intelligent Designer|designer]] is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the test is [[Darwinian evolution]]. The claim of the [[evolutionary biologists]] is that unintelligent causes did the whole job. If they can prove it, then the counter-hypothesis that you need intelligence has been tested, and it has been shown to be false. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html]
See also:
*[[Creationism]]
:It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a [[Intelligent Designer|designer]] is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the test is [[Darwinian evolution]]. The claim of the [[evolutionary biologists]] is that unintelligent causes did the whole job. If they can prove it, then the counter-hypothesis that you need intelligence has been tested, and it has been shown to be false. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html]
See also:
*[[Creationism]]