Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 6:
Line 6: + + + + + Line 18:
Line 23: + + Line 26:
Line 33: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
moved Talk:Sexual intercourse (quote) to Talk:Sexual ethics
:Yeah, but doesn't this perpetuate the slander that conservatives are afraid of sex? :) [[User:DLerner|DLerner]]
:Yeah, but doesn't this perpetuate the slander that conservatives are afraid of sex? :) [[User:DLerner|DLerner]]
::Not so much perpetuate as confirm... to judge from many things I have seen on this service, I think conservatives *are* afraid of sex, or at least open acknowledgement of it. [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
Why is this page locked? And why is the only comment Bible-related? Either erase it and lock it or put something more on it. [The kids find out about it sometime, whether your encyclopedia wants them to or not...] [[User:FlightlessOstrich|FlightlessOstrich]] 16:50, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
Why is this page locked? And why is the only comment Bible-related? Either erase it and lock it or put something more on it. [The kids find out about it sometime, whether your encyclopedia wants them to or not...] [[User:FlightlessOstrich|FlightlessOstrich]] 16:50, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
:I find it amusing that Osterich is one of the few users without his head in the sand. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
Surely even homeschoolers should know how babies are made. God created our bodies and created sex - what are these dumboes afraid of? [[User:Alberti|Alberti]] 10:32, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
Surely even homeschoolers should know how babies are made. God created our bodies and created sex - what are these dumboes afraid of? [[User:Alberti|Alberti]] 10:32, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
::That's for their parents to deal with. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
::Because they believe [[God]] made humanity, but He subcontracted out the pink bits to [[Satan]]. Or so they seem to act some times... --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 17:12, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
==Article needs expansion==
==Article needs expansion==
There can hardly be the slightest objection to something as simple as that, a matter-of-fact description for children of how we all came to be. [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 16:55, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
There can hardly be the slightest objection to something as simple as that, a matter-of-fact description for children of how we all came to be. [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 16:55, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
::I anticipate plenty of objection. For a start, tell a child or young teenager how, and they might want to try it. It also means we have to make articles on mate, penis and virgina, tripling the contriversy. Here's an idea: Disappear the lot. Delete the page, prevent it ever being created again. Do the same for everything that deals with human sexuality. It's just easier than spending years bickering over what we can say, and we are very unlikely to reach any agreement. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
:Why do you suppose we might object, if we "can't" object? Can you figure out our motives? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:58, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
:Why do you suppose we might object, if we "can't" object? Can you figure out our motives? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:58, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
:::One final thought on this. I would encourage you to take the view that if you '''don't''' offer your readership ''some'' kind of answer to 'The Big Question', they will go off-site and Lord knows there's no way you would want them typing 'sexual intercourse' into their browser to Google the info, is there? You can easily imagine where they would end up. Why not offer them correct and 'Conservapedia-appropriate' information that you are comfortable with instead of driving them away to find out about it at more salacious sources? If you provide the information, you control how that is presented. Not providing the information is simply encouraging searches at less 'trustable' sources. [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 15:25, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
:::One final thought on this. I would encourage you to take the view that if you '''don't''' offer your readership ''some'' kind of answer to 'The Big Question', they will go off-site and Lord knows there's no way you would want them typing 'sexual intercourse' into their browser to Google the info, is there? You can easily imagine where they would end up. Why not offer them correct and 'Conservapedia-appropriate' information that you are comfortable with instead of driving them away to find out about it at more salacious sources? If you provide the information, you control how that is presented. Not providing the information is simply encouraging searches at less 'trustable' sources. [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 15:25, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
Are you saying that your motivation for expanding the current article is to educate children about where they come from? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:30, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
:Yes, of course. What else could have possibly understood? [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 15:32, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
==New Proposed article contents==
'''Sexual intercourse''' is the physical mechanism by which [[human beings]] [[reproduce]] and produce [[offspring]]. During sexual intercourse, the male's [[sperm]] can [[fertilise]] the female's [[egg]], shortly thereafter the mother becomes [[pregnancy|pregnant]], and the [[child]] forms in the [[womb]].
I suggest the above for the content of this article. I have removed the references to the body parts, in the interest of getting ''anything'' better than what is currently in this article. The article is locked, so perhaps we can discuss this with the intent of putting this os something similar in here? [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 17:28, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
:Or how about a link to [[Human reproduction]]? [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] 11:00, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
==Category==
"Human sexuality" doesn't exist as a category. I'd recommend "Sexuality" instead. [[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 17:24, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
I'd also like to recommend you put this in the "Quotes" category, because it is a quote indeed. [[User:JonathanG|JonG]]<sup>[[User_talk:JonathanG|I am a beautiful trap]]</sup> 16:08, 29 June 2009 (EDT)