Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 560: Line 560:     
::::: Perhaps someone else mentioned that number.  I don't see how it is relevant.  It would include people who were in just one movie, and maybe never even quit their day job!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:47, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
 
::::: Perhaps someone else mentioned that number.  I don't see how it is relevant.  It would include people who were in just one movie, and maybe never even quit their day job!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:47, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::: It most definitely would include people who would not be 'relevant', but it's a start.  We must start to quantify these numbers ''somehow'', as otherwise it's just an assertion - and I know you don't want your theory based on an assertion.  But over a half a million is a good start.  Certainly I imagine there's tens of thousand of those who would fit our profile and are, or were professional actresses.  Certainly, we can see that there's at the very least hundreds of touring young women in the rock and pop business in the 'Western' world.  Next I hope to quantify jazz singers, classical musicians, circus performers and Broadway show-style performers.    [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 16:57, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
    
==Confused==
 
==Confused==
166

edits

Navigation menu