17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
Debate: If not naturalism, how do we decide which supernatural explanation is correct? (view source)
Revision as of 21:13, May 24, 2008
, 21:13, May 24, 2008no edit summary
All things are not equally true, but I also maintain that people often create false dichotomies. They assume that supernaturalism and naturalism are mutually exclusive, when it is highly possible that they are actually the same thing. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 16:16, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
All things are not equally true, but I also maintain that people often create false dichotomies. They assume that supernaturalism and naturalism are mutually exclusive, when it is highly possible that they are actually the same thing. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 16:16, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
Ok, but what makes one religion true and another false? They sure can't all be true, and in terms of evidence, it's pretty much all anecdotal. Why are you (let's say) a Christian and not a Scientologist? [[User:Paddyduffy|Paddyduffy]]