121
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 22:
Line 22: + +
Debate:Is Darwinism liberal or is it conservative? (view source)
Revision as of 01:10, May 27, 2008
, 01:10, May 27, 2008→Discussion
A third vote for the obvious "neither". Science is neutral with regards to everything except the evidence. Politics and religion, however, are not always neutral regarding science. Sometimes they assist in the work of science, sometimes they hinder it. If your religion or politics compels you to reject some part of science, it's not the science that's biased. [[User:Human|Human]] 18:41, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
A third vote for the obvious "neither". Science is neutral with regards to everything except the evidence. Politics and religion, however, are not always neutral regarding science. Sometimes they assist in the work of science, sometimes they hinder it. If your religion or politics compels you to reject some part of science, it's not the science that's biased. [[User:Human|Human]] 18:41, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
Neither. Even Social Darwinism is neither as it is just a misinterperted spinoff of Darwin's Natural Selection. --[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 21:10, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
=== Is Gravity Liberal or is it Conservative? ===
=== Is Gravity Liberal or is it Conservative? ===