Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
Correlation does not prove causality, but non-correlation proves non-causality.
The difference between [[science]] and [[superstition]] lies in the ways an idea is tested. Scientists test a [[theory]] by drawing conclusions from it, [[hypotheses]] which can be confirmed or contradicted by observation.
The difference between [[science]] and [[superstition]] lies in the ways an idea is tested. Scientists test a [[theory]] by drawing conclusions from it, [[hypotheses]] which can be confirmed or contradicted by observation.
Correlation does not prove causality, but non-correlation proves non-causality. [http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm#Message5980]
[[Category:Logic]]
[[Category:Logic]]