Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Points of view
Line 120: Line 120:     
::From the "recent changes page" it looks like the site was manually taken down to prevent vandalism. But that's just speculation on my part. --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 10:22, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::From the "recent changes page" it looks like the site was manually taken down to prevent vandalism. But that's just speculation on my part. --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 10:22, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Point of view==
 +
What's the policy here on points of view in articles? E.g. [[evolution]]: the first section is on transitional forms. There is clearly another point of view to this article - should I add it?. Even a Christian, fundamentalist, creationist organisation argues here [http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dont_use.asp] that transitional forms is a fairly weak argument to use in the debate with evolution - should I add that? Regards [[User:The Land|The Land]] 16:23, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
4

edits

Navigation menu