127
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 72:
Line 72: + + +
Debate: If not naturalism, how do we decide which supernatural explanation is correct? (view source)
Revision as of 20:45, May 29, 2008
, 20:45, May 29, 2008no edit summary
I did not intend for this to turn into a debate about Creationism, I merely wanted to highlight what I see as tenuousness in the criteria of deciding between supernatural explanations of events, or if I may make an extension of this idea, religions themselves. Upon what grounds may a Christian say that Islam is false, yet Christianity is true? Or that a cult such as Scientology is explicitly false?
I did not intend for this to turn into a debate about Creationism, I merely wanted to highlight what I see as tenuousness in the criteria of deciding between supernatural explanations of events, or if I may make an extension of this idea, religions themselves. Upon what grounds may a Christian say that Islam is false, yet Christianity is true? Or that a cult such as Scientology is explicitly false?
[[User:Paddyduffy|Paddyduffy]]
[[User:Paddyduffy|Paddyduffy]]
There are no grounds to make such claims. These are matters of personal belief, not objective knowledge. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 16:45, 29 May 2008 (EDT)