Changes

And now I'm curious.  This article seems to have an anti-relativity bias.  Why is relativity unAmerican or unChristian (besides the fact that Einstein was a German Jew)?

And now I'm curious.  This article seems to have an anti-relativity bias.  Why is relativity unAmerican or unChristian (besides the fact that Einstein was a German Jew)?

And what's up with the Obama reference?  I don't think God asks politicians (liberal or conservative) for their opinions when he establishes His natural law.

And what's up with the Obama reference?  I don't think God asks politicians (liberal or conservative) for their opinions when he establishes His natural law. (unsigned by User:QED)

:I looked at your edits for this and found them to be wanting.  The information on the Nobel committee is accurate.  It's a small part of the article and no specific conclusions are stated from it.  I can see why you would believe this is not a slight on relatively, nevertheless it is true as written.  In the absense of any counter evidence, such as writings by the Nobel committee explaining this, it should be allowed to stand.  Your other point is, temporarily, out of bounds.  You may believe that relativity allows for faster than light movement 'virtually', but unless you have a source, it's not going to be included.  In other words your conjecture is not going to trump a source that appears to take a neutral position.

:I looked at your edits for this and found them to be wanting.  The information on the Nobel committee is accurate.  It's a small part of the article and no specific conclusions are stated from it.  I can see why you would believe this is not a slight on relatively, nevertheless it is true as written.  In the absense of any counter evidence, such as writings by the Nobel committee explaining this, it should be allowed to stand.  Your other point is, temporarily, out of bounds.  You may believe that relativity allows for faster than light movement 'virtually', but unless you have a source, it's not going to be included.  In other words your conjecture is not going to trump a source that appears to take a neutral position.

:Lastly, do not try to play the minority card again.  You aren't Johnny Cochran.  The article on Einstein is extensive and written with great respect.  I'm assuming you could already have checked it up to see the view on him at CP.  Consider this to be your one and only warning in this area. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:38, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

:Lastly, do not try to play the minority card again.  You aren't Johnny Cochran.  The article on Einstein is extensive and written with great respect.  I'm assuming you could already have checked it up to see the view on him at CP.  Consider this to be your one and only warning in this area. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:38, 29 May 2008 (EDT)