Changes

'''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District''' was a federal court case in which activist judge [[John E. Jones III]] ruled that [[Intelligent design]] was [[creationism]]. Jones wrote that Intelligent Design "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents". The [[Discovery Institute]] found that in his decision Jones has copied verbatim from the [[ACLU]]'s proposed findings of fact. Casey Luskin, a scholar of [[intelligent design]] at the Discovery Institute has shown that the decision was grounded in [[judicial activism]], and Judge Jones has admitted to this.<ref>http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/11/judge_jones_admits_the_activis.html</ref>

'''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District''' was a federal court case in which activist judge [[John E. Jones III]] ruled that [[Intelligent design]] was [[creationism]]. Jones wrote that Intelligent Design "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents". The [[Discovery Institute]] found that in his decision Jones has copied verbatim from the [[ACLU]]'s proposed findings of fact. Casey Luskin, a scholar of [[intelligent design]] at the Discovery Institute has shown that the decision amounts to [[judicial activism]], although Judge Jones has denied this.<ref>http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/11/judge_jones_admits_the_activis.html</ref>

After this case, use of the term "[[cdesign proponentsists]]" came into vogue among evolutionists critical of Intelligent Design and Creationism.

After this case, use of the term "[[cdesign proponentsists]]" came into vogue among evolutionists critical of Intelligent Design and Creationism.