3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
Debate: To what extent should we have obscenity laws (view source)
Revision as of 01:05, May 31, 2008
, 01:05, May 31, 2008cmt
So here's my question: To what extent should there be '''legal''' "limits" on obscenity? I open the floor to all opinions. '''---[[user:DLerner]]---''' 02:22, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
So here's my question: To what extent should there be '''legal''' "limits" on obscenity? I open the floor to all opinions. '''---[[user:DLerner]]---''' 02:22, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
:There should be absolutely no limits on "obscene" speech, and the Supreme Court was incorrect in its interpretation of the Constitution when it ruled obscene speech was not protected by the First Amendment. ''All'' speech is protected by the First Amendment. If a parent doesn't want their child exposed to inappropriate material, then send the to private schools, and don't own televisions or computers. Inconvenience is the price you pay for living a moral life. The Bible explicitly said living a moral life would be hard, so what's the problem? Rather than invest so much power in a government that is so corrupt, it is best to cowboy up and deal with the problems the Bible predicted for you. [[User:LibDeist|LibDeist]] 21:05, 30 May 2008 (EDT)