Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 622: Line 622:  
:: It hasn't been explained on this talk page at all.  Harald asked the question above, Kristkrispies added a criticism, and the only reply was from Ed Poor suggesting the section be rewritten. QED asked about it also, and the reply didn't address that point.
 
:: It hasn't been explained on this talk page at all.  Harald asked the question above, Kristkrispies added a criticism, and the only reply was from Ed Poor suggesting the section be rewritten. QED asked about it also, and the reply didn't address that point.
 
:: However, rereading the footnote (or did I miss that before?), I can see a very tenuous connection, but not one that warrants it being included in this article.  I suggest it be removed.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:44, 31 May 2008 (EDT)
 
:: However, rereading the footnote (or did I miss that before?), I can see a very tenuous connection, but not one that warrants it being included in this article.  I suggest it be removed.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:44, 31 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: Philip, I'm assuming you're referring to the Obama reference.  The heading explains it.  Political insights are a key part of this site, and explaining [[political benefit]] to something is essential to understanding why it is emphasized and/or misrepresented.  The [[theory of relativity]] is used, or misused, to advance [[liberal]] goals, and the Obama reference is an important illustration of that.  Would you like to see more examples?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:16, 31 May 2008 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,960

edits

Navigation menu