Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 64: Line 64:     
:::Philip: Thanks for your comment.  I used the NCSE link because they also have what looks like every transcript of the proceedings available on-line.  Even if you don't like their politics or science, they are a handy reference for all the Kitzmiller documents.  That being said, I don't mind if the other reference is used.  In defense of Judge Jones, his denial of his alleged activism was a part of his verdict which came before the Discovery Institutes charge of activism; therefore he didn't address any specific claim leveled against him.  I feel that any further discussion of any alleged activism on his part should be reserved for another article that is linked to this one. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 11:05, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
 
:::Philip: Thanks for your comment.  I used the NCSE link because they also have what looks like every transcript of the proceedings available on-line.  Even if you don't like their politics or science, they are a handy reference for all the Kitzmiller documents.  That being said, I don't mind if the other reference is used.  In defense of Judge Jones, his denial of his alleged activism was a part of his verdict which came before the Discovery Institutes charge of activism; therefore he didn't address any specific claim leveled against him.  I feel that any further discussion of any alleged activism on his part should be reserved for another article that is linked to this one. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 11:05, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
==Edit==
 +
 +
Philip:  The quote box for the disclaimer looks good, thanks. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 15:53, 1 June 2008 (EDT)
300

edits

Navigation menu