250
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 113:
Line 113: + +
Talk:Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District (view source)
Revision as of 01:04, June 2, 2008
, 01:04, June 2, 2008Reply
:::Do you always accuse people of "imagining" things when they point out that things need to be referenced properly or that one shouldn't report statements by biased sources? [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 21:01, 1 June 2008 (EDT)
:::Do you always accuse people of "imagining" things when they point out that things need to be referenced properly or that one shouldn't report statements by biased sources? [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 21:01, 1 June 2008 (EDT)
::::Well for a start the plaintiffs in the case were parents, the current article implies if not states that the plaintiffs were the ACLU and AUSCS. The case was not to censor any mention of ID, but instead to stop a statement in favour of it being read out. A sourced statement from the uscourts.gov site has been removed which explained why the Lemon Test and endorsement test should be applied. Can you tell me which of these are biased or not referenced correctly? [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 21:04, 1 June 2008 (EDT)