Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Type of article: Clarifying Andy's response.
Line 183: Line 183:     
: A reader should be able, based on the first 100 or so words, to understand the significance of the outcome of the case.  I don't mind fluff later in the entry, but it should not obscure the essence that needs to be on the first page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:23, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
 
: A reader should be able, based on the first 100 or so words, to understand the significance of the outcome of the case.  I don't mind fluff later in the entry, but it should not obscure the essence that needs to be on the first page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:23, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:# So you seem to be saying that this one article can cover both the legal and the wider social aspects.
 +
:# And you agree that what you call "fluff" that you removed can go in the article after all, but not near the beginning.  That's pretty much what I suggested earlier.
 +
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:42, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu