300
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 169:
Line 169: + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District (view source)
Revision as of 16:00, June 2, 2008
, 16:00, June 2, 2008no edit summary
:::The award was $2m, but ultimately my understanding is that ACLU and the other organization agreed to accept $1m "to lessen the burden on the district." Probably both facts should be stated. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 11:34, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
:::The award was $2m, but ultimately my understanding is that ACLU and the other organization agreed to accept $1m "to lessen the burden on the district." Probably both facts should be stated. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 11:34, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
::::Mr. Schlafly: A few observations:
::::*It seems that you now have the time to edit all my 'mistakes' and 'obviously inappropriate information'. Seems to me you could have saved a lot of time by pointing out all your concerns before I made the edit.
::::* Based on your reasoning then, Pepper Hamilton should be mentioned because they had a share in the award along with the ACLU and the AU. Do I have your permission to make the appropriate update to this article so we can comply with your rules? By the way, my reference is this. [http://yorkdispatch.inyork.com/local/ci_3535139] If I'm not mistaken, I gave you this reference once before, and it didn't come from Wikipedia.
::::*Where exactly is the false information that allegedly came from Wikipedia? Please let me know because I hate to be the purveyor of inaccurate or false information.
::::*I know the initial award fee was $2 million dollars, I have never contested that fact nor did I try and change it. All I ever did was point out that the award fee was reduced. Care to reference your opinion that the award fee was massive? Need to keep the article honest and devoid of unreferenced opinion. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 12:00, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
== Type of article ==
== Type of article ==