Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 23:02, June 2, 2008

283 bytes added ,  23:02, June 2, 2008
→‎Criticism of Conservapedia "rare or non-existent": reply
Line 347: Line 347:     
:: Correct me if I'm confused, but were you not referring to the sentence in the WP article which states "The site has come upon much criticism from those who have accused it of factual inaccuracies and bias"?  [[User:StatsFan|StatsFan]] 11:10, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:: Correct me if I'm confused, but were you not referring to the sentence in the WP article which states "The site has come upon much criticism from those who have accused it of factual inaccuracies and bias"?  [[User:StatsFan|StatsFan]] 11:10, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: Right, but there are few or no criticisms of Conservapedia for "factual inaccuracies."  The citation by Wikipedia for its claim is to a New York Times article that actually criticizes Wikipedia for harping on such a claim.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:02, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,445

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/465163"

Navigation menu