111
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
no edit summary
:::it shouldn't be necessary to talk to the sysops, they should talk here about it being biased. and if time has a liberal bias, why doesn't the fox news article say that fox news article has a conservative bias, and a reference from a openly conservative source saying that it is anti-liberal, just means that its not biased toward conservativeness-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 09:39, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
:::it shouldn't be necessary to talk to the sysops, they should talk here about it being biased. and if time has a liberal bias, why doesn't the fox news article say that fox news article has a conservative bias, and a reference from a openly conservative source saying that it is anti-liberal, just means that its not biased toward conservativeness-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 09:39, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
::::That implies that all magazines that aren't conservative are automatically considered to be liberal, and that is a obvious misnomer. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 10:43, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
::::That implies that all magazines that aren't conservative are automatically considered to be liberal, and that is a obvious misnomer. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 10:43, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::im sorry if i implied that, (and is there a 3 revert rule or some conservapedia equivalent? cause all this reverting is annoying) but i don't think that i did imply that. and i agree that non conservative magazines aren't necessarily liberal, although i would like to see something that shows why this is biased, while fox news is "fair and balanced"-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 23:48, 2 June 2008 (EDT)