86
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 177:
Line 177: +
→Note on item 5. of the list on bias
::: If the ratio are irrelevant, why do we use them. It just make us look bad, like we fudge numbers as we please. --[[User:Order|Order]] 15 March 2007 10:30 (AEST)
::: If the ratio are irrelevant, why do we use them. It just make us look bad, like we fudge numbers as we please. --[[User:Order|Order]] 15 March 2007 10:30 (AEST)
:::: I'm not sure why Conservapedia tried to use them to discredit Wikipedia, ask the creator. Either way, using statistics in that way, whether correct or not, is misleading and irrelevant. It proves absolutely nothing. --[[User:ALFa|ALFa]] 01:51, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
:::: I'm not sure why Conservapedia tried to use them to discredit Wikipedia, ask the creator. Either way, using statistics in that way, whether correct or not, is misleading and irrelevant. It proves absolutely nothing. --[[User:ALFa|ALFa]] 01:51, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
::::: Well, it is also not true that more Americans are conservative than liberal. Most Americans are pro-choice, over half of all Americans think that gays should be granted some kind of partnership rights, most Americans support social security, most Americans trust Democrats more on issues such as education, economics. In most recent polls more Americans trust Democras on national security issues than they do Republicans. And if we define conservativism the way that this site does, than it represents a very small minority of American opinion.--[[User:Jack|Jack]] 19:21, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
== Conservapedia:Article Improvement Drive ==
== Conservapedia:Article Improvement Drive ==