2,002
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: + +
no edit summary
::Is this the definition, Liberal = good guy, non-liberal = bad guy? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:37, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
::Is this the definition, Liberal = good guy, non-liberal = bad guy? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:37, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
::: No, look at the article on [[Liberal]] how conservapedia defines it. And there you find that liberal is defined as pro-gay, pro trade-union, pro-affirmative action, pro-gender equality, pro-foreign immigration, pro-disarment, anti-militaristic. And he was obviously none of it. -- [[User:Order|Order]] 18 March 2007, 10:22 (AEST)
A liberal? I doubt it. A totalitarian fascist dictator would be a more accurate description. A left wing or right wing view of his politics is irrelevant to the fact that he was responsible for the deaths of millions of people - something which surely all people from all sides of the political spectrum find horrifying.
A liberal? I doubt it. A totalitarian fascist dictator would be a more accurate description. A left wing or right wing view of his politics is irrelevant to the fact that he was responsible for the deaths of millions of people - something which surely all people from all sides of the political spectrum find horrifying.