Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 278: Line 278:  
::: No, you overstate it.  A better example would be if a [[conservative]] starred in a movie featuring sex and nudity.  The howls of protest by [[liberals]] would be deafening!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:55, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::: No, you overstate it.  A better example would be if a [[conservative]] starred in a movie featuring sex and nudity.  The howls of protest by [[liberals]] would be deafening!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:55, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
   −
::::But, [[Hollywood values]] embrassed by all [[Liberals]] would mean they were desesortised to this. Actually could you explain this why would "liberals" be out raged, you have spent all this time saying they like that in their movies. People only seem to care about movies featuring sex and nudity when some former child star appears in them and news reporting go along the line "she (it is always she they care about) is sheading her innocent image". This might comes as a shock to you but most of the world doesn't think of actors as liberal/conservative and judge their movies on that basis. [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 19:30, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
+
::::But, [[Hollywood values]] embrassed by all [[Liberals]] would mean they were desensortised to this.  
 +
 
 +
::::Actually could you explain this why would "liberals" be out raged, you have spent all this time saying they like that in their movies. People only seem to care about movies featuring sex and nudity when some former child star appears in them and news reporting go along the line "she (it is always she they care about) is sheading her innocent image". This might comes as a shock to you but most of the world doesn't think of actors as liberal/conservative and judge their movies on that basis. [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 19:30, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
346

edits

Navigation menu