789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
no edit summary
::: No problem - but until I can convince others that the OFFICIAL term for the Belfast Agreement has NOTHING to do with the ludicrous notion of an "anti-religious conspiracy", I'm afraid it seems I will be debating that point for quite some time yet. Thanks, though, for your understanding - I'm sure you get annoyed when foreigners perceptions of Mexico are presented as 'fact', when you know it to be wrong. [[User:WaltherPPK|WaltherPPK]] 19:22, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
::: No problem - but until I can convince others that the OFFICIAL term for the Belfast Agreement has NOTHING to do with the ludicrous notion of an "anti-religious conspiracy", I'm afraid it seems I will be debating that point for quite some time yet. Thanks, though, for your understanding - I'm sure you get annoyed when foreigners perceptions of Mexico are presented as 'fact', when you know it to be wrong. [[User:WaltherPPK|WaltherPPK]] 19:22, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
This one is a fight you can't win. A good try, but the task is literally impossible. If you can prove that Belfast Agreement is the more commonly used term very concretely, then it doesn't matter because CP is an American site. If you can't prove that Belfast Agreement is the more commonly used term, then you are wrong and it is not. Rock and a hard place.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 20:00, 3 June 2008 (EDT)