nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: +
Yes, but I'll modify my comment anyway.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:57, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:57, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
::can you name one news organization that DOESN'T have both liberals and conservatives on it? so that means that no magazines/newspapers/news channels have bias (time magazine included)?-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 22:06, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
::can you name one news organization that DOESN'T have both liberals and conservatives on it? so that means that no magazines/newspapers/news channels have bias (time magazine included)?-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 22:06, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
::: Again, I'm not that familiar with America, but yes, I could name at least a couple of Australian ones that essentially don't have a conservative journalist/columnist/whatever on them. But perhaps I should modify what I said before a bit, because a single token conservative (for example) among a sea of liberals on staff would hardly make a news organisation unbiased. You'd have to have about 50/50 for there to be no bias. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:31, 4 June 2008 (EDT)