59
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: +
no edit summary
:::::::No, it hasn't. You've not said why it's an invalid comparator, only that you consider it is invalid. I've given my reasons. What are yours? In an event, my statements on this page aren't "silly". It was quite reasonable of me to request reasons for my edits being removed. However, due to a complete lack of response from you, I had no option but to leave further messages in order to try and obtain an answer. [[User:Dnotice|Dnotice]] 13:54, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::::No, it hasn't. You've not said why it's an invalid comparator, only that you consider it is invalid. I've given my reasons. What are yours? In an event, my statements on this page aren't "silly". It was quite reasonable of me to request reasons for my edits being removed. However, due to a complete lack of response from you, I had no option but to leave further messages in order to try and obtain an answer. [[User:Dnotice|Dnotice]] 13:54, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
::::::::Two things: First, you will prove the validity of your case here, which means you will leave a detailed comparison between today's war on drugs and 1920's alcohol prohibition; the burden of proof rests on you and you alone to make your case. Second, you don't make demands of me or anyone else here. I know of your little blog [http://d-notice.blogspot.com/] which smacks of someone who is against what Conservapedia is about, and you will not bring those beliefs here in the least. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:26, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
::::::::Two things: First, you will prove the validity of your case here, which means you will leave a detailed comparison between today's war on drugs and 1920's alcohol prohibition; the burden of proof rests on you and you alone to make your case. Second, you don't make demands of me or anyone else here. I know of your little blog [http://d-notice.blogspot.com/] which smacks of someone who is against what Conservapedia is about, and you will not bring those beliefs here in the least. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:26, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::::::As grateful as I'm for the free publicity of my blog (I'm guessing that it's a members-only benefit), the whole "<i>We don't want you type around here</i>" attitude isn't really a productive way to resolve matters, nor is it beneficial to the aim of creating an encyclopaedia. I'm trying to resolve matters in a civilised way, so I fail to see how my quite reasonable request for a reason for your reversion can be classed as a "demand". Please can you show how it falls under this description? In any event, how can I make edits when you've locked the article? [[User:Dnotice|Dnotice]] 11:43, 4 June 2008 (EDT)