Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,722 bytes added ,  15:22, June 5, 2008
Rebuttals of problems
Line 28: Line 28:  
::Thanks, I was trying to use a similar style to attract the attention of Conservative [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 21:23, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::Thanks, I was trying to use a similar style to attract the attention of Conservative [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 21:23, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::: Heh.  There are some people whose examples you should follow, and some you should not! :-) [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:43, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::: Heh.  There are some people whose examples you should follow, and some you should not! :-) [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:43, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Rebuttals of problems ==
 +
 +
1. Chicken or the Egg problem regarding DNA and proteins:  Numerous theories exist as to how either RNA or proteins could have first arisen, but more prosaically, the fact that we do not know exactly how this may have happened does not mean it did not happen.  We don't know how gravity works either, but nobody's claiming it doesn't.  Also, see #4
 +
 +
  2. Complexity of the cell: The complexity of the cell has nothing to do with abiogenesis, as abiogenesis doesn't concern itself with the evolution of the cell, just the genesis of the most basic forms of life.
 +
 +
  3. Catch 22 problem regarding oxygen and the early earth: Jason Dwarkin et al. discovered during experiments simulating conditions on early earth that surprising resulted in the formation of fluorescent bubbles capable of absorbing enough UV and converting it to visible light to protect organic molecules.  [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/98/3/815]
 +
 +
  4. Implausibility of the RNA World hypothesis. Altman and Cech won the Nobel Prize in 1989 for proving that RNA could act as a biocatalyst (like an enzyme) and sequence itself without proteins, proving the RNA world hypothesis plausible.  [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1989/press.html]
 +
 +
  5. Chirality problem:  much like #1 there are a number of competing theories.  Example:  Toxvaerd [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract;jsessionid=5C0DD80C6FEE2ACD15DF6A7DDB86B8CD.tomcat1?fromPage=online&aid=335346]
 +
 +
  6. Polymerization problem: like #1 again, numerous theories.  example:  Oro and Stephen-Sherwood [http://www.springerlink.com/content/p805621h4774p6gt/]
 +
 +
[[User:Xyrophile|Xyrophile]] 11:22, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
60

edits

Navigation menu