60
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 587:
Line 587: + + + +
Double Standard
:Sure: how about a 'see also' link at the end? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:14, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
:Sure: how about a 'see also' link at the end? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:14, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
== Double Standard ==
The page on [[evolution]] (falsely) criticizes evolution for being unfalsifiable, yet bands over backwards to allow Bacon's inductive reasoning as a legitimate line of demarcation. While I (and mainstream scholars of the philosophy of science) reject Popper's narrow view of falsifiability as the demarcation between science and conjecture, it seems anything but trustworthy to hold both models to differing standards. [[User:Xyrophile|Xyrophile]] 13:40, 5 June 2008 (EDT)