nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: +
→Violation of Commandment 3: Not their position.
:::::: It has to do with whether the "this is art" response in any way answers the objection. It is meant to show that "this is art" should not be a valid response. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:03, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::: It has to do with whether the "this is art" response in any way answers the objection. It is meant to show that "this is art" should not be a valid response. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:03, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
::::::: Well, photographs of naked minors are pretty clearly not art. Non-pornographic murals quite clearly are. [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 17:14, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
::::::: Well, photographs of naked minors are pretty clearly not art. Non-pornographic murals quite clearly are. [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 17:14, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
::::::::: That may be your position, but many artists here defended the photographs (which were hanging in an art gallery) as art. As for "non-pornographic", surely that's begging the question? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:31, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::::: Philip, Liberty is often represented as a woman with one or both breasts bared. Don't ask me why. Hope that helps. --[[User:Leda|Leda]] 17:19, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::::: Philip, Liberty is often represented as a woman with one or both breasts bared. Don't ask me why. Hope that helps. --[[User:Leda|Leda]] 17:19, 5 June 2008 (EDT)