25
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + + + +
Debate:Is Conservapedia blinkered? (view source)
Revision as of 10:37, June 7, 2008
, 10:37, June 7, 2008→NO!
This is not your website, if you want YOUR website to discuss such matters, by all means do so, just don't link to it from here. Seeing as those who do own this website do not want to discuss such things doesn't make it 'blinkered' or whaterver you call it. This is known in Capitalism as the Protection of Property, and the owners of this website clearly do not want info on such things stored in their databases. You have no right to complain. --[[User:Capercorn]] <small> [[User Talk:Capercorn|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Capercorn|contribs]] </small> 16:14, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
This is not your website, if you want YOUR website to discuss such matters, by all means do so, just don't link to it from here. Seeing as those who do own this website do not want to discuss such things doesn't make it 'blinkered' or whaterver you call it. This is known in Capitalism as the Protection of Property, and the owners of this website clearly do not want info on such things stored in their databases. You have no right to complain. --[[User:Capercorn]] <small> [[User Talk:Capercorn|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Capercorn|contribs]] </small> 16:14, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
:The owners can erase articles by all means, but then making grand claims that "the truth shall set you free" is hypocrisy.
I have every right to criticize Conservapedia. It's a free country. --[[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 06:37, 7 June 2008 (EDT)