296
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 259:
Line 259: +
Talk:Falsifiability of evolution (view source)
Revision as of 14:31, June 7, 2008
, 14:31, June 7, 2008no edit summary
: And the dissimilar DNA argument is just as silly. It basically says that if two organisms were found to be more similar than expected according to the evolutionary family tree (i.e. common descent), then evolution would be wrong. But this has been found numerous times. All that happens is that the family tree is rearranged (you said yourself that the "next step is to adjust the theory to account for the discrepancies") rather than evolution being discarded.
: And the dissimilar DNA argument is just as silly. It basically says that if two organisms were found to be more similar than expected according to the evolutionary family tree (i.e. common descent), then evolution would be wrong. But this has been found numerous times. All that happens is that the family tree is rearranged (you said yourself that the "next step is to adjust the theory to account for the discrepancies") rather than evolution being discarded.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:25, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:25, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
::"(although many evolutionists conflate the two)," - not to mention many creationists. [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 10:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)