nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 264:
Line 264: +
Talk:Falsifiability of evolution (view source)
Revision as of 15:31, June 7, 2008
, 15:31, June 7, 2008→Edit summary: You missed the other point.
::::: Essentially, yes. I can't recall any particular ones at the moment, other than what's mentioned in [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/2722/ this article] (search for "As does CMI", and read that and the next paragraph). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:04, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
::::: Essentially, yes. I can't recall any particular ones at the moment, other than what's mentioned in [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/2722/ this article] (search for "As does CMI", and read that and the next paragraph). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:04, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::: Er, the only person named there is Darwin, who is hardly representative of current evolutionary science. [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 11:12, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::: Er, the only person named there is Darwin, who is hardly representative of current evolutionary science. [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 11:12, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
::::::: Yes, he's the only one ''named'', but they also refer to the promotion of the peppered moth example of natural selection being used by evolutionists as evidence of ''evolution''. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)