1,161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + +
no edit summary
''Physics is the study of nature, and is the science of studying the laws of God's universe''
:''Physics is the study of nature, and is the science of studying the laws of God's universe''
God in this context is completely irrelevant. If this is the case, we should also have God's Ball, God's incline,God's Scientists, God's Galileo. Having "the" instead of "God's" universe is less biased (aren't we trying to reduce bias). --[[User:Sm355|Sm355]] 21:11, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
God in this context is completely irrelevant. If this is the case, we should also have God's Ball, God's incline,God's Scientists, God's Galileo. Having "the" instead of "God's" universe is less biased (aren't we trying to reduce bias). --[[User:Sm355|Sm355]] 21:11, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
:No, it's implied through the rest of the article. It's not irrelevant because God created it, He deserves the the credit. We are privileged to be able to study and figure out different aspects of His creation. That's what science is, the study of God's creation. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 21:14, 18 March 2007 (EDT)