Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 245: Line 245:     
: Where is there any evidence of the statement actually being read, or of students actually hearing it?  There was a full, $2+ million trial.  Surely if the statement were actually read, there would be testimony about its alleged terrible effects.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:34, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
 
: Where is there any evidence of the statement actually being read, or of students actually hearing it?  There was a full, $2+ million trial.  Surely if the statement were actually read, there would be testimony about its alleged terrible effects.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:34, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I thought that because Judge Jones's ruling said the administrators were forced to read the disclaimer because of the teacher's refusal to do so would suffice.  I'm sure there was testimony to this effect in the trial transcript but I sure don't feel like looking through thousands of pages to confirm what should be obvious.  The disclaimer was read to the students based of the judge's ruling; that should be enough to delete your claim that it was never read to the students.  If you want to make the case that there were or were not 'terrible effects', that is entirely a different matter. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 13:27, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
300

edits

Navigation menu