360
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + +
Debate:The 90/10 rule exists soley to squash debate, and should be eliminated (view source)
Revision as of 18:33, June 7, 2008
, 18:33, June 7, 2008no edit summary
I absolutely agree that the 90/10 rule serves only as a rationalization for the arbitrary banning of users who present legitimate arguments and foster debate within the conservapedia community. We have all seen that the majority of users don't abide by the 90/10 rule (including Sysops and admin). This rule serves only as a means to authoritatively monitor the site. --[[User:AndrasK|AndrasK]] 10:26, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
I absolutely agree that the 90/10 rule serves only as a rationalization for the arbitrary banning of users who present legitimate arguments and foster debate within the conservapedia community. We have all seen that the majority of users don't abide by the 90/10 rule (including Sysops and admin). This rule serves only as a means to authoritatively monitor the site. --[[User:AndrasK|AndrasK]] 10:26, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
Of course it does. It's just another way to silence debate and give an excuse to block those who are a problem.
==No==
==No==