44
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 94:
Line 94: + +
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (view source)
Revision as of 19:10, June 7, 2008
, 19:10, June 7, 2008→Negative Reception: Mentioned some other sites that poorly recieved Expelled.
John Derbyshire, a columnist at the [[conservative]] [[National Review|National Review Online]], wrote a surprisingly critical review, ''despite not having seen the film'', and confused [[intelligent design]] with [[creationism]]. He said that "[[creationists]]" have been "morally corrupted" and engage in "willful act[s] of deception." He concludes that attacking "science" (i.e. [[evolution]]) is equivalent to attacking [[Western Civilization]].<ref>http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZGYwMzdjOWRmNGRhOWQ4MTQyZDMxNjNhYTU1YTE5Njk=</ref>
John Derbyshire, a columnist at the [[conservative]] [[National Review|National Review Online]], wrote a surprisingly critical review, ''despite not having seen the film'', and confused [[intelligent design]] with [[creationism]]. He said that "[[creationists]]" have been "morally corrupted" and engage in "willful act[s] of deception." He concludes that attacking "science" (i.e. [[evolution]]) is equivalent to attacking [[Western Civilization]].<ref>http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZGYwMzdjOWRmNGRhOWQ4MTQyZDMxNjNhYTU1YTE5Njk=</ref>
It has also been (unfairly) poorly recieved by the general public, with a user rating of 3.8 out of 10 On the Internet Movie Database website, only 3 positive reviews out of 33 on the website Rotten Tomatoes, and a 20 out of 100 rating on the website metacritic.
== Issues surrounding the film ==
== Issues surrounding the film ==