1,161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + +
no edit summary
::::I have to agree with Sm355 about this. The articles whould be factual in every possible way to make this site a credible source for information. Because it is still unproven that the Christian god created the universe, the word "the" fits much better into the article. Also, for a good portion of the purposes this article might be used for, the word "God's" would be an unacceptable term(I'm talking about schools, etc.).[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]]21:28, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
::::I have to agree with Sm355 about this. The articles whould be factual in every possible way to make this site a credible source for information. Because it is still unproven that the Christian god created the universe, the word "the" fits much better into the article. Also, for a good portion of the purposes this article might be used for, the word "God's" would be an unacceptable term(I'm talking about schools, etc.).[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]]21:28, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
:::::I disagree, obviously. The Bible does count as proof. Take the ''Messianic prophesies of Christ'' as just one example. That right there proves that God spoke to us humans through the Bible, and that the Bible is an accurate account of history. That would also imply that the Christian God created everything, and thus He deserves the credit. "the" couldn't fit less with the article. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 21:35, 18 March 2007 (EDT)