Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,601 bytes removed ,  23:53, June 8, 2008
→‎Political views: Tighten up and clean up section
Line 101: Line 101:  
::''We are hungry for change!'' S.C. January 26, 2008.
 
::''We are hungry for change!'' S.C. January 26, 2008.
   −
Barack Obama in his short stint as Senator of Illinois, has made clear his opposition to [[U.S. Military]] in policy and in rhetoric. Obama has spent much energy to remind America of the war that should have never been waged and that we should not be there at all, in any way.  In 2002, as an unknown Chicago representative to the state of Illinois, he declared his opposition to the Iraqi conflict. At a the time, America was united in the stance against terrorism. At the time, the prospects of a rogue enemy with WMD worried the United States. Since elected to Congress, he voted against the Emergency War Supplemental. Obama did not oppose his party debating the bill long past the timeframe requested. This action directly affects troop deployment in combat zones. Obama has repeatedly called for the return of troops in Iraq. Barack Obama has a no confidence vote for the 'Surge' before the measure was put forth by General Petraus to Congress. Obama would not denounce MoveOn's slander NY Times advertising against the General. 
+
Obama has spent much energy to remind America of the war that should have never been waged and that we should not be there at all.  In 2002, as a state representative, he declared his opposition to the Iraqi conflict. Since elected to Congress, he voted against the Emergency War Supplemental. Obama did not oppose his party debating the bill long past the time frame requested. Obama has repeatedly called for the return of troops in Iraq.  
   −
Barack Obama now uses [[Liberal obfuscation]] when claiming to be a military supporter. As of 2008, he now supports the military and it's funding as long as America commits to the upgraded GI Bill.<ref>[http://www.townhall.com/news/politics-elections/2008/05/22/mccain,_obama_spar_on_gi_bill]</ref> This bill essentially adds $50 billion over 10 years as added benefits to our sworn military personnel. Democrats created this as political tool to use against the GOP presidential nominee, who opposes, and to remind America that the Democrats support the troops.  If you look closely, you will notice that the Pentagon, the Generals and the military commanders in theatre, do not want this bill. It is a virtual recruitment center blockade. The Army Public Affairs office estimated the military spends $50,000 - $64,000 training our enlisted. First tour veterans would receive the same benefits as re-deployed soldiers getThree years of duty is enough for the benefits to start. This upgraded benefits entice the trained soldier to leave active duty, estimated at 16% loss. This bill guarantees we will deplete our noncommissioned officers, which John McCain feels would hurt the military and our country very badly. This bill is projected to cost the military an addition $2.8- $4 billion per month, not including new recruitment services. Adds to troop readiness decline in a time of war. It will be paid for in taxes of those earning $500,000 to $1 million a year, for ten years. If crafted without political intention, a satisfactory bill that all could agree on would have emerged. Democrats want Americans to believe if you don't support the upgraded GI Bill, you are not supporting the the U.S. troops.
+
Barack Obama now uses [[Liberal obfuscation]] when claiming to be a military supporter. As of 2008, he now supports the military and its funding as long as America commits to the upgraded GI Bill, known as [http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:s.00022: Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2007] (S.22). The bill is currently supported by the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA), The Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), The American Legion, and Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA), amongst other groupsIt was introduced in the Senate where it had 57 co-sponsors, including a number of Republicans. It passed the Senate by a vote of 75-22, and in the House by a vote of 256-166.
    
== Foreign policy experience ==
 
== Foreign policy experience ==
1,352

edits

Navigation menu