Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
could we have... both?
Line 3: Line 3:  
Since when is ''describing'' the topic "liberal bias".  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:36, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Since when is ''describing'' the topic "liberal bias".  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:36, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:Phillip, it kinda stuns me that you would ask this question. This is Conservapedia, a wiki where you are a senior administrator, and it's been clear for over a year now that liberal bias is whatever ASchlafly says it is. I mean, what did you think? [[User:AliceBG|AliceBG]] 22:38, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:Phillip, it kinda stuns me that you would ask this question. This is Conservapedia, a wiki where you are a senior administrator, and it's been clear for over a year now that liberal bias is whatever ASchlafly says it is. I mean, what did you think? [[User:AliceBG|AliceBG]] 22:38, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
 
+
::Oh... Phillip. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 02:00, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Not sure what these comments refer to, but the substance of this topic needs to be clear and up-front, not relegated to an obscure link at the end that most people will not bother clicking.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:55, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Not sure what these comments refer to, but the substance of this topic needs to be clear and up-front, not relegated to an obscure link at the end that most people will not bother clicking.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:55, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:It refers to the fact that in your eagerness to spin, you seem to have eliminating any explanation of the actual topic of the article.
 
:It refers to the fact that in your eagerness to spin, you seem to have eliminating any explanation of the actual topic of the article.
Line 10: Line 10:  
:: It obscured the truth.  Many people could read the version you reference and come away completely clueless about how ''classroom prayer does not exist due to censorship of it.''--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:17, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:: It obscured the truth.  Many people could read the version you reference and come away completely clueless about how ''classroom prayer does not exist due to censorship of it.''--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:17, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::Well, okay, but people can read your version and come away completely clueless about what classroom prayer is.  Can you at least re-add the definition of the term and the description of its common manifestations, please?--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 00:24, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::Well, okay, but people can read your version and come away completely clueless about what classroom prayer is.  Can you at least re-add the definition of the term and the description of its common manifestations, please?--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 00:24, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
Andy, could there be some kind of compromise? Where the current version is kept - detailing the truth about censorship, etc. - but the explanatory paragraphy defining the topic (from the previous version) is at least added at some point in the article. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 02:00, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
902

edits

Navigation menu